Skip to main content

Sunny California


I'm settled into a church family's house here in Valencia, and boy is it great. I like listening to my pastor talk about theology. He is also a wonderful counselor, and has been helping me work with some of my personal problems (yes, I know it's hard to believe, but I do have problems). Here is his blog site, if anybody is interested: The Craw. Also, here is the website of my church, along with its blog: Saint Andrew's Community Church, The Chronicles of Saint Andrews. In the meantime, I have been reading The Shape of Sola Scriptura by Mathison, who also wrote Given For You. Both of these books have had an enourmous impact on me, and I strongly encourage all of you to get out and read The Shape of Sola Scriptura, particularly if you've ever struggled with the authority of the Bible, and how it squares away with church tradition. The thesis is that most evangelicals treat the issue of the Bible and tradition wrongly, particularly those in radically reformed churches, such as Baptist/Mennonite/Amish circles.

The picture above shows a park that is right across the street from where I am living. Valencia is truly a beautiful place!

Comments

Anonymous said…
Well, I would look at The Shape of Sola Scriptura, but my library doesn't have it.

grr...
February 5, 2007 at 2:15 PM
Yokanchi said…
Libraries can request books you know, Chandler.
February 5, 2007 at 6:33 PM
Anonymous said…
Yes they can, but this book isn't available for inter-library loans. Also, the library never buys the books I request. *sigh*
February 5, 2007 at 8:28 PM
Anonymous said…
What do you mean in your profile by "not a normal upbringing"?
February 6, 2007 at 12:48 PM
Yokanchi said…
weird, do you know why?
February 6, 2007 at 4:26 PM
Anonymous said…
Why?
February 6, 2007 at 7:08 PM
Anonymous said…
Curious, Deric: What constitutes a church being "radically" reformed, beyond being Baptist, Mennonite or Amish? I'm not entirely familiar with that phrase. (Yes, I know -- I should probably just go read the book and then I'll find out!)
February 9, 2007 at 11:34 AM
Unknown said…
Excellent question, my friend. The official Wikipedia definition of the radical reformation is: "The Radical Reformation was a 16th century response to both the perceived corruption in the Roman Catholic Church and the expanding Protestant movement led by Martin Luther. Focused primarily on the peasant class of Germany and the Low Countries, the Radical Reformation birthed many Anabaptist groups throughout Christendom." They are that group of people who, unlike the more mainstream protestants, such as the followers of Luther, Calvin, and Zwingli, rejected church authority altogether: the Anabaptists. Early forms of Anabaptists were those who followed Leiden and the Batenburgers. Later forms include Mennonites, Hutterites, and Amish. There are forms of radical reformers that do not derive from the Anabaptists, such as the early Unitarians, but for the most part the Radical Reformation can be equated with Anabaptist groups and subgroups.
February 9, 2007 at 3:37 PM
Anonymous said…
Ahh... the infamous so-called "re-baptizers".
February 11, 2007 at 8:01 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How Many Will Enter Heaven?

Check out this quote I found online: "[C]onsider this fact: fewer than 20% of people actually think they are going to hell. And yet, in answering that question, Jesus says in Matthew 7 that FEW pass through the gate that leads to eternal life. 80% doesn't sound like few to me... do some of us have the wrong idea?" There are a number of problems with this quote. First of all, you it is assuming that "few" refers to the current ratio of professing Christians to non-Christians. What's to say that Jesus isn't referring to the entire population of all the earth over all time? In that case, it's entirely plausible that 80% of people now are really Christians, as long as there are still few total Christians when all is said and done. Maybe it applies only to the people in the crowd listening to Jesus. Or, it could refer to something else entirely (as I believe). Jesus was talking to a specific people living in a specific time. We cannot decontextualize his ...
11 comments
Older Posts »

On the Biblical Mandate to Respect Authority

The SC choir chaplain brought up a passage in 1 Peter at the beginning of this week regarding submission to authority. It led to interesting conversation, and I'd like to reiterate part of that conversation here. 1) It is important to remember that the early churches who passed around these letters had a very practical use for them. The early church could have easily been stomped out had the early Christians been too anti-government. True, the church was persecuted. True, the church did get into trouble with the government. However, remember that the persecution happened for short bursts of time (historically speaking) and only in isolated areas. It was by no means universal persecution. Additionally, when you look at other early Christian documents, you see more injunctions to work with the rulers. And why not? The early church needed all the support it could get, while not compromising, of course. If they were all outspoken government radicals, they would not have lasted long. 2)...
8 comments
Older Posts »