Skip to main content

Religious Conversation With An Old Friend - Part 5

Upon reading the first part of this message, I recognize that I won't be able to put forth the thought & self-examination necessary to continue & thoroughly consider your challenge until at least this weekend - hope you can understand (I just don't want to do so in haste)!

One thing in response to the first part: do you believe that truth can ever be self-authenticating? I believe this is what happened to me: 


And even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled only to those who are perishing. In their case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God. For what we proclaim is not ourselves, but Jesus Christ as Lord, with ourselves as your servants for Jesus' sake. For God, who said, 'Let light shine out of darkness,' has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ. (2 Corinthians 4:3-6).


For sure there is much more, but coupled with the historical reliability of the claims of Christ's life/death/resurrection, this is where it starts for me.

I am forcing myself to not say more until I've considered what you wrote - if you want more detail regarding why I believe Christianity is true, I agree with: http://www.desiringgod.org/resource-library/taste-see-articles/eight-reasons-why-i-believe-that-jesus-rose-from-the-dead (I hate sending a link to make arguments for me, but I thought I'd at least disclose one resource I have been helped by. I don't worship John Piper, at least not anymore, but I have been greatly aided by his scholarly & pastoral pursuits.)

For saying "I'm not going to reply back right away", I sure had alot to say... :-/ I fail.

-Stephan

Comments

The Atheist Girl Next Door said…
Ok, first and foremost, I want to give you, Stephan, mad props for even engaging in this conversation with Deric in as open minded and public a fashion as you are. You are opening yourself up for criticism and more importantly personal examination and that is very brave and commendable. Secondly, I, like Deric was once a very earnest Christian. I am currently 26 and would say I was Christian at least until I was about 22 or so. I taught Sunday School, Vacation Bible School, and volunteered in several capacities with a children’s summer camp (affiliated with the Kansas City Union Mission). I took my Christianity VERY SERIOUSLY. I believed in the inerrant, inspired word of God. I thought mentioning that I was a Christian was important, in-so –much-as to say I believe I can genuinely relate to the arguments you are making. I made similar arguments and believed similar things about God/the Bible at one time too. So, please do not take my rebuttals to come as condescending or in any way meant to demean you. I actually respect you a great deal for your pluck!
Moving on. This “self-authenticating” argument you make. You must admit, this quite literally means your proof for the existence of God/the divinely inspired and inerrant quality of the Bible is purely subjective. Its authentication is found within yourself. So, now you must explain to me how your subjective truth is more convincing than my subjective truth.

Next point. This business of quoting the Bible has got to stop. You must first prove to me that this Bible has any validity, THEN you may quote it to me with your heart’s content. But, to quote something that I do not find convincing just on its face. . .What do you hope to accomplish? I believe this is how you and Deric even began this conversation. Deric questioned the Bible’s inerrancy and you took up the Bible’s case. Ok, that’s fine. Take up the case for the Bible and your God if you wish. But, how do you ever hope to convince me of the Bible’s inerrancy/truth through quoting the Bible? Honestly, my good man, how convinced would you be of Islam if a Muslim quoted the Qur'an to you? You would be no more convinced than I am when you quote the Bible.

Be honest with yourself, you believe the Bible is true, period, with no reasoning beyond your subjective reasoning that you believe God has changed your life for the better b/c of it. This is, in fact, the “self-authenticating” argument you just made and linked to the Pastor John website about. Ok, that’s fine. But, please, appreciate your perspective. You believe in the Bible for completely subjective reasons that can neither proven nor disproven. You do not believe in the Bible b/c it is true, you believe in the Bible therefore you tell yourself it is true.

You play with reasoning and facts as long as they prove your hypothesis, that the Bible is true, divinely inspired, and inerrant. But at the end of the day, you are not gathering evidence, then reasoning towards a conclusion. You have your conclusion, collect evidence that supports it, then reason backwards to get at that conclusion.

To me, we have to ask ourselves, are we interested in arriving at an objective truth or subjective truth? Truth that can be arrived at with testable claims, evidence, and even “reasoning about historical facts” Pastor John minimizes in your link? Or are we interested in justifying what we already believe with “spiritual illumination” and “revelation.” If you are interested in justifying your personal truth that God is real b/c he has made your life better: gravy. More power to you, my man. I will never argue with YOUR personal truth. But, if you are interested at arriving at an objective truth then let’s talk about objective evidence, which excludes the Bible or what God has personally revealed to you. If you argue that you do not believe real “truth” can be arrived at through only objective facts then you are conceding that your truth is subjective.

Much Love,

Sarah
February 18, 2011 at 2:19 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Jesus, Lover of my Soul

An old friend and spiritual mentor of mine left a comment on my last "Religious Conversation" Post . It provoked so much thought that I wanted to share it with everybody, because I know quite a few of my religious friends are reading this, and I know quite a few of you who would make a similar statement. Here it is: There is an element in this conversation that is being overlooked (at least, I presume). There is an aesthetic beauty and, more, an affection, which Steven appears to have for God. This is not illogical; in fact, all human beings exhibit it for something. It may be subjective, and it is not conclusive, but it is completely logical. And I can't imagine an argument that would refute it. It is something like a man saying, "I love my wife. I appreciate her many virtues and charms; I believe her to be the woman most worthy of my affection and lifelong commitment." If I say this and someone were to say to me, "But EVERY man says that of his bride!
9 comments
Older Posts »

How Many Will Enter Heaven?

Check out this quote I found online: "[C]onsider this fact: fewer than 20% of people actually think they are going to hell. And yet, in answering that question, Jesus says in Matthew 7 that FEW pass through the gate that leads to eternal life. 80% doesn't sound like few to me... do some of us have the wrong idea?" There are a number of problems with this quote. First of all, you it is assuming that "few" refers to the current ratio of professing Christians to non-Christians. What's to say that Jesus isn't referring to the entire population of all the earth over all time? In that case, it's entirely plausible that 80% of people now are really Christians, as long as there are still few total Christians when all is said and done. Maybe it applies only to the people in the crowd listening to Jesus. Or, it could refer to something else entirely (as I believe). Jesus was talking to a specific people living in a specific time. We cannot decontextualize his
11 comments
Older Posts »

After Summer Sosltice

my very first priority for the day was to sleep in as late as possible. when my foul roommate woke me up I had to shift to priority number two: be as comfortable as possible - normal routine be damned. Upon shuffling my way into the kitchen, I discovered a moth, wet-plastered to a dirty pan. "I feel your pain, buddy." Sitting on the couch next to a glass of water, I wish I could devise a way to get the water in me without having to move my arms or head. My vacant glazed gaze gathers itself toward a brochure on the coffee table:Tips 4 Teens - Alcohol Abuse I laugh (only mentally) and for a moment, the shaking stops. Jesus, it's good to be alive.
7 comments
Older Posts »